01Upload
Generating a hundred thumbnails was never the bottleneck. Knowing which one to ship is.
URIM produces genuinely different options, then screens them the way a viewer actually sees them — before you spend a test slot finding out.
See how it worksThirty candidates, all plausible. Producing them is the cheap part.One survives the rubric. That judgement is the bottleneck — and it is the part URIM is actually built for.
The one thing to understand
They see a small tile on a phone, for about one second, next to your title, competing with eleven other videos. That is the only viewport that matters — and it is why AI thumbnails so often disappoint. Toggle between a composition built for the tile and one built for the poster, then compare them at the size that counts.
Your video
Your biggest lever
It's a separate layer, so you can rewrite it on any candidate instantly — no re-render. Most tools bake the text in, which quietly costs you the ability to test copy at all. Try it:
2 of 4 words — over the cap. Thumbnails under four words measurably out-click wordy ones.
URIM does the volume. Every judgement call stays with you — and the last step feeds back into the third, so it gets tuned to your channel rather than to general advice.
01Upload
02Review the brief
03Pick directions
04Generate
05Review scores
06Edit the text
07Ship three
08Learn
01
Your callYour video and a working title. No brief to write.
02
Your callThe payoff, the peak moment, the curiosity gap, and what the video actually delivers. Errors are cheapest to fix here.
03
Your callConcepts arrive as words, before anything is drawn. Structurally different from each other — not one idea in six colours.
04
URIMArtwork for the directions you kept. A saved face reference keeps recurring people looking like themselves.
05
Your callEach candidate is scored at browse size on clarity, legibility, contrast, emotional read, and curiosity.
06
Your callThe headline is a separate layer. Rewrite it on any candidate instantly, with no re-render.
07
Your callInto YouTube Test & Compare, which picks the winner by watch time rather than clicks.
08
URIMResults feed back, so suggestions get tuned to your channel rather than to general best practice.
The guardrail
If you only optimise for clicks, you get clickbait. That isn't a moral argument — it's a mechanical one. YouTube watches what happens after the click. A thumbnail that wins clicks and loses viewers gets suppressed: you get a spike, then a colder algorithm than you started with.
So every candidate is checked against what your video actually delivers, and the ones that overpromise are cut — however well they score elsewhere. That's the guardrail working. It's protecting the channel, not the thumbnail.
Where our claims stop is as useful to know as where they start.
URIM's job
Yours
Nobody's to promise
A thumbnail sells the click; the video keeps the viewer. High CTR on a video people leave is worse than no click.
Scoring catches technical problems — illegible, low contrast, unreadable at size. It does not know your audience.
Generation runs in minutes. Plan it as a step in your upload process, not something you do while the upload bar fills.
Testing three good options beats shipping one guess. That is the honest claim.
URIM is in development. Leave an address and we'll get in touch when there's a version worth your time — and tell you plainly what it can and can't do yet.